In light of the most recent carnage wrought upon our
country, the usual outcry for gun regulation seems like a simple solution. In my experience, simple solutions to complex
problems are extremely rare. Somewhere
between a total ban on gun ownership and rhetoric that accomplishes
nothing, there are some things that can be done to improve the current
situation. Compromise is a term that has
been dropped almost entirely from our national and legislative lexicons. I think most would agree that we shouldn’t
continue to ignore the daily gun violence in our cities and the occasional “nut-job”
making a statement that so shocks our nation for brief periods immediately
after that “statement.” There are some
things that are possible that will not solve the problem but would bring about some, albeit limited, improvement.
As a gun owner and concealed weapons permit holder I believe
in the 2nd amendment. I
believe that responsible citizens should have the right to self-preservation. Those same responsible citizens should be
able to own weapons that will permit them to protect their persons, families,
and homes. I believe that, those
individuals who would like to hunt animals for food should be allowed to do so.
With all of that said, none of these scenarios would require
a semi-automatic long gun. Hunters
should be able to develop their skills so that a bolt action, lever action, or
pump action long gun would be all that is required to kill an animal for
food. I do not believe in trophy hunting. For self-defense purposes where your life or
home are threatened a handgun would, in most scenarios, be sufficient. In rare instances, a long gun might be
advisable but with the same restrictions as placed on hunters.
I also think our current 24-hour news media contribute to
our problem. After every mass shooting,
the media post the name(s) and pictures of the individual or individuals
responsible. They interview the friends
and families of the perpetrator(s) ad nauseam. In essence, the media gives
these individuals the notoriety they seem to crave. While our first amendment would preclude any
restrictions on such media coverage, they, the media, should be strongly encouraged
to limit their coverage to the event and not the infamy of the
perpetrator(s). All pictures of
perpetrators should have a derogatory stamp across their face(s) that indicates who or what they are. Coward, Murderer, and Sociopath come to mind. I wouldn’t use the term
Terrorist, as that seems to be a badge of honor with many of these deviants.
I have a few suggestions for national change:
- Ban the manufacture and sale for personal use, of all semi-automatic long guns*.
- Current owners of semi-automatic long guns may keep them in their homes for personal protection but may not use them outside their homes except at licensed gun ranges.
- Establish a government sponsored buy-back of semi-automatic long guns.
- Current owners of semi-automatic long guns may not transport such weapons except to and from their homes and licensed gun ranges or for the purpose of a legitimate government buy- back.
- Current owners of semi-automatic long guns may not sell or transfer ownership to anyone outside their immediate family or through a government buy-back.
- Ban the ownership of fully automatic weapons by anyone outside the established military. This ban would include current federal licensees and local law enforcement.
- Establish very severe sentencing guidelines for the mere possession of any semi-automatic* or fully automatic* long gun in the commission of any felony. [These would be sentencing guidelines where a judge would have discretion, but it would be possible to impose a very severe penalty for mere possession of such weapons during the commission of a felony.]
- Background checks should be required for all gun sales. (Go to my article on “Gun Control” for more information on the process)
- Establish a secure National Identification Card as part of the background check process. This multi-purpose ID card, while normally voluntary, would be a requirement for a gun purchase. The link above provides more detail on the process.
- Ban the manufacture and sale of any ammo clip or magazine that protrudes from the natural shape and design of the original weapon.
* Definitions-Information
* A long gun is typically any weapon designed to be fired braced against the shoulder. The barrel length varies in legal definitions. For this discussion, any barrel length exceeding 10" would qualify as a long gun regardless its inclusion or lack of a shoulder brace.
* A semi-automatic weapon is one that requires a separate finger pull of the trigger to fire each round where the spent cartridge is ejected from the weapon.
* A fully automatic weapon requires a single trigger pull to fully discharge as many bullets as are available as long as the trigger is held depressed.
* The barrel length of any weapon influences the potential muzzle velocity of any bullet fired from that weapon. The longer the barrel, the greater the potential damage to the target.
So I should not have my Remington 1100. The government will give me what 50.00 dollars for it I have over a 1,000 in it.
ReplyDeleteI could have bought an AK 47 in Iraq for 25 dollars. Don't you think someone who goes over seas a couple times wouldn't buy one there and mail it back. Oh that's against the law. So is killing people.
1. No, the government should give you a fair price for your weapon. You may, by my plan, keep your semi-auto shotgun for self protection at home. 2. I have to ask, why do you feel you need an AK 47? Our nation is not a war zone.
DeleteVery well said Jack.
ReplyDelete