"It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen," George Orwell’s 1984.
If the battered and tattered U.S. Constitution survives this most recent onslaught, the future retelling of these current events warrants a Hollywood documentary. The “If” in that statement has never been more tenuous and the odds of our Constitution’s survival, barring some unforeseen major event, are not good. I say documentary because this story needs no embellishment
or deviation from actual events to be a harrowing tale of a near catastrophe. If that future movie is not in the category of horror, you will know that the worst case scenario played out and that our Constitution did not survive.
We have seen political fiction put in a movie format before and found it entertaining and often disturbing. After viewing such movies, we could return to the safe reality that was our previous existence. That luxury is no longer. Never again will we feel safe knowing that our founding document and its laws, will protect us from the evil that exists in the hearts of some of our fellow countrymen.
Some previous movie fiction offerings predicted dire circumstances but were seen as whimsical fantasies of some dystopian future from which we were somehow protected. I have often seen the book/movie 1984 used in current references. George Orwell has another book/movie that would have valid elements of reference for today’s events, Animal Farm. Its’ main character Napolean utters his famous line, “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
These movie references provide a common level of understanding to simplify more complex events. We all know the most famous stories and can relate by a mere mention of their names. Catch-22 provides a wealth of common threads. Lines like, “The country was in peril; he was jeopardizing his traditional rights of freedom and independence by daring to exercise them.” Or, how about, “[They] agreed that it was neither possible nor necessary to educate people who never questioned anything.” Wow, Heller nailed it.
In another Heller Catch-22 reference that I found applicable to the machinations of our diabolical deceiver, “The chaplain had mastered, in a moment of divine intuition, the handy technique of protective rationalization, and he was exhilarated by his discovery. It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.” Our vindictive vitriolic ruler has that "no character" part in spades. It's his "trump" card.
Of course, one of the scariest political fiction book/movies is The Manchurian Candidate. In that story, a plot is woven to place a Joseph R. McCarthy-like vice-presidential candidate in the line of succession and then to assassinate the presidential candidate at their national convention. The killing would be blamed on the Communists (Russia) so that this new president could assume dictatorial powers. While there is no direct corollary in current events aside from the creation of a scenario that would elevate a president to a dictator, it should be known that The Manchurian Candidate plagiarized parts of another book/movie written in 1934, called I, Claudius. In the historical novel about the Roman Emperor Claudius, he is administered an "Olympian Mixture" that enables others to manipulate him for their own benefit. In his drugged state Claudius is so bizarre that he is worshipped as a god. Once Claudius is relieved of his drugged state, he decides to continue as a mad monarch rather than reign as a benevolent one.
Yes, we have a rich well of political fiction with which to draw comparisons, but the real events will need to be told with little deviation from the truth. This of course assumes that “truth” still exists as an idea with any meaning. For that to happen the current status quo will need a major disruption. Congress, SCOTUS, and others will need to take a stand. This current group needs to stop saying, “Donald Trump is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.” This is a quote paraphrased from The Manchurian Candidate, that was repeated by the brainwashed group to praise the leader of their captured infantry platoon.
To the extent that Donald Trump can be manipulated through such praise that would bring normal individuals to gag with convulsive fits, we will be governed by our own mad monarch along a path dictated by “others” and their diabolical Project 2025. Like the Catch-22 directive, Project 2025 isn’t explicitly a directive so much as it is a rule of bureaucratic absurdity providing a procedural framework for destructive chaos. The fact that this current administration and its avid collection of misfits, has seen cause to have Catch-22 banned and challenged in school districts and libraries, is telling.
Without that “unforeseen major event” we will need to continue to try to survive the chaos. There is a phrase from a Chinese short-story collection from 1627, that states, "it's better to be a dog in a peaceful time than be a man in a chaotic period." This is possibly the source of the more recent, “May you live in interesting times,” that is presented as a Chinese curse to be used in periods of turmoil and upheaval. Curse or simple fact, the jury is still out. I, for one, would appreciate a return to some semblance of normality than be ruled by a madman willing to risk our future for his own amusement. Only the mad would use chaos as a drug.
I’ll leave you with another reference to Joseph Heller’s Catch-22:
“There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he was sane, he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.
"That's some catch, that Catch-22," he observed.
"It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed.”